Subject: from BMJ for 3-21-09
[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------
(3)
Concern over Google links to worrying medical claims(Personal view: Google needs better control of its advertisements
and suggested links)
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.b1083(Personal view: A Reformation for our times)
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.b1080Google needs better control of its advertisements and suggested
links to avoid web pages that contain worrying medical claims, warn
doctors in an article published on bmj.com today.
Dr Marco Masoni and colleagues at the University of Florence in
Italy suggest that, as the internet is not well policed and
regulated, it is up to members of the medical community to be
vigilant and to suggest improvements.
They recently used Google Italia to search on the keyword "aloe"
and found sponsored links to websites recommending aloe arborescens
for the prevention and treatment of cancer and offering it for sale.
AdWords is "Google's flagship advertising product" and was its
"main source of revenue in 2007." Through it, users can create
advertisements, choose their own key words, and decide which Google
queries their advertisements should match. Google decides on
placement on its pages of search results: which advertisements to
show and in what order.
But Google's automated matching to search terms sometimes places
inappropriate advertisements. For example Google Guide (which is
neither affiliated with nor endorsed by Google), says: "In
September of 2003, adjacent to a New York Post article about a
gruesome murder in which the victim's body parts were stashed in a
suitcase, Google listed an ad for suitcases. Since that incident,
Google has improved its filters and automatically pulls ads from
pages with disturbing content."
But the authors argue that Google filters must be improved further.
Google has often said that it wishes to enter the healthcare arena
in many ways, say the authors. "We think that a necessary first
step for Google is to improve its filters and algorithms so as to
prevent possible harm to its users," they conclude.
"We are experiencing a healthcare reformation," says Joanne Shaw
from NHS Direct in a second article. "The internet has brought the
canon of medical knowledge into the hands and homes of ordinary
people, and this should be welcomed and encouraged as good for
patients and doctors alike." It is true that the internet may be a
further source of alarm for the worried well, but equally it
encourages early presentation and action that could improve
survival and reduce complications from long term conditions, she
writes.
Furthermore, the internet does not diminish the role of doctors but
casts them as expert advisers rather than authoritarian figures
with exclusive guardianship of special knowledge denied to ordinary
people.
Many doctors already act according to those principles, and many
patients will continue to want a more traditional style of
relationship with their doctors. But people who look to the
internet as a legitimate tool to help them with their health may
already be in the majority and this is something for us to
celebrate, she concludes.
Contacts:
Dr Marco Masoni, Faculty of Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
Email: <m.masoni [bat] med.unifi.it>
Joanne Shaw, Chair, NHS Direct NHS Trust, UK
Email: <joanne.shaw [bat] healthstrategy.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]
.