Print

[Pangwall]

ES IST PASSIERT!

Wir können nicht mehr zurück. Wir können das Rad der Zeit nicht zurückdrehen. Wir sitzen bis über beide Ohren in der Scheiße. Es ist Krieg. Es ist ein Krieg mit der Natur. Und es ist ein Bürgerkrieg: Die Idioten treiben in ihrer verfluchten Blödheit und Skrupellosigkieit die Menschheit weiter in den Untergang.

Es ist jetzt das "Szenario", das immer wieder in Science-Fiction-Filmen beschrieben wurde: Tag X nach Landung von Aliens, Tag X nach Auftauen von urzeitlichen Monstern, Tag X nach Einschlag von Meteoriten, Tag X nach Entweichen eines Virus aus einem Forschungslabor, Tag X nach was auch immer.

UND ES IST TAG X!

Es ist fünf nach zwölf.

Es HAT geknallt!

ES BRENNT!

... und unsere hochverehrten Schweinepriester im Amt, die ehrwürdigen Parlamentarier und Minister und Kanzler und Präsidenten, sie allesamt sind die Inkarnation des Vollidioten und Charakterschweins schlechthin.

Trump ist nicht das einzige Schwein auf der Erde!


Wo wir schon dabei sind: Sieht man sich die Vollidioten und ihr hirnloses Gezappel beim Kampf gegen Covid-19 an, glaubt da jemand noch ernsthaft, daß dieses Idiotenpack JEMALS die Klimakatastrophe in den Griff bekommen würde? Selbst in tausend Jahren nicht!

Wir stehen mitten in der Apokalypse, die Erde kocht, die Natur stirbt, und die Irren bringen mit ihrer Idiotie 8 Milliarden Menschen um, die mehr als 7,5 Milliarden, die es jetzt noch gibt, und die 500 Millionen der nächsten Generation. Und das war's dann. Dann ist die Erde wieder menschenfrei. Leider wird es dann auch weniger als 5 Prozent der heutigen Tier- und Pflanzenarten geben, weil Hitze und Covid-19 die Tiere ausrotten und weil die Hitze sowieso alles vernichtet.

Große Regionen der Erde sind vernichtet. Urwälder? Gibt es nicht mehr. Endlose Müllhalden, die Ozeane die größten und weitreichendsten, sind gefüllt mit Giften und Plastik, an dem die Tiere JETZT verenden und die nächsten TAUSENDE JAHRE weitere Milliarden Tiere sterben werden, weil sie das Mikroplastik aufnehmen.


Die Erde ist wieder ein öder Steinklumpen auf dem Flug durch das All.

Um die Menschen ist es nicht schade. Aber die Natur tut mir leid.


[Ortho gerettet. Julian]

[Yulli]

PUSH!

[ventuzia giganta]

Ein Jahr ist vergangen. Das Mittelmeer brennt.

[Krant]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGeNp0UWUAIRD-W?format=jpg&name=large

In Dänemark verdoppelt sich die Infektionszahl in 40 Stunden. Bis Weihnachten dürften 97 Prozent der Bevölkerung erreicht sein.

Das ist das Ende. Die Krankenhäuser und die gesamte Logistik im Land werden zusammenbrechen.

[Krik]

On the road downhill mankind has passed one more point of no return:

Do note: This is only an anchor. Do go to the original page and read there!

[*quote*]
News > WebMD Health News
New Omicron Subvariant Is 'Crazy Infectious,' COVID Expert Warns

Ralph Ellis
January 10, 2023

Editor's note: Find the latest COVID-19 news and guidance in Medscape's Coronavirus Resource Center.

The newest subvariant of Omicron, XBB.1.5, is so transmissible that everybody is at risk of catching it, even if they've already been infected and are fully vaccinated, a health expert told  USA Today .

"It's crazy infectious," said Paula Cannon, PhD., a virologist at the University of Southern California. "All the things that have protected you for the past couple of years, I don't think are going to protect you against this new crop of variants."

XBB.1.5 is spreading quickly in the United States. It accounted for 27.6% of cases in the country last week, up from about 1% of cases at one point in December, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It's especially prevalent in the Northeast, now accounting for more than 70% of the cases in that region.

It's spreading across the globe, too. Maria Van Kerkhove, PhD., technical lead of the World Health Organization, has called XBB.1.5 is "the most transmissible subvariant that has been detected yet."

Ashish Jha, MD, the White House COVID-19 response coordinator, tweeted a few days ago that the spread of XBB.1.5 is "stunning" but cautioned that it's unclear if the symptoms of infection will be more severe than for previous variants.

"Whether we'll have an XBB.1.5 wave (and if yes, how big) will depend on many factors including immunity of the population, people's actions, etc.," he tweeted.

He urged people to get up to date on their boosters, wear a snug-fitting mask, and avoid crowded indoor spaces. He noted that people who haven't been infected recently or haven't gotten the bivalent booster likely have little protection against infection.

The symptoms for XBB.1.5 appear to be the same as for other versions of COVID-19. However, it's less common for people infected with XBB.1.5 to report losing their sense of taste and smell, USA Today reported.
Sources

USA Today: "People who haven't had COVID will likely catch XBB.1.5 – and many will get reinfected, experts say"

CDC: COVID Data Tracker

Credits:
Lead image: Wave Break Media Ltd/Dreamstime
WebMD Health News © 2023

Recommendations

    Omicron Subvariant XBB.1.5 Accounts for 27% of US COVID Cases
    What Do We Know About COVID Variant XBB.1.5?
[...]
[*/quote*]

GO THERE AND DO READ:
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/986759

[VanLaraklios]

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20241115/Pandemic-linked-to-1625-rise-in-babies-born-with-heart-defects.aspx

[*quote*]
News-Medical
Medical Home Life Sciences Home

Pandemic linked to 16% rise in babies born with heart defects

    Download PDF Copy

Editorial Checklist Reviewed
City St George's, University of London
Nov 15 2024
NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The proportion of babies born with a congenital heart abnormality increased by 16 per cent after the first year of the pandemic, according to research at City St George's, University of London and published today in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Heart defects are the most common type of anomaly that develop before a baby is born, with around 13 babies diagnosed with a congenital heart condition every day in the UK and impacting one in 110 births globally . These include defects to the baby's heart valves, the major blood vessels in and around the heart, and the development of holes in the heart.

In over 18 million births, researchers analysed data from US birth certificates from the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) between December 2016 and November 2022 to evaluate the effect of the pandemic on the number of babies born with a congenital heart defect.

They compared the number of babies born with a congenital heart condition every month before the Covid-19 pandemic (1st December 2016 to 30th November 2019) with those during the pandemic (1st December 2020 to 30th November 2022).

This data was then compared to the number of babies born with Down's Syndrome - a genetic condition not affected by the virus. This was to help ascertain if any differences observed might have been due to Covid-19, or if they were a result of other factors including limited access to antenatal services during the pandemic.

A total of 11,010,764 births before and 7,060,626 births during the pandemic were analysed. Data was adjusted to account for mother's BMI, diabetes and blood pressure before pregnancy, age, number of times they had given birth and the season in which prenatal care started.

The number of births with a congenital heart condition increased by 16% after the first year of the pandemic, with 65.4 cases per 100,000 live births compared to 56.5 per 100,000 births in the period studied before the pandemic.

The number of babies born with Down Syndrome did not change for the duration of the study, suggesting that the increase in fetal heart defects were not due to a disruption of health services.

    Studying this large US dataset has revealed an unexpected picture for how the pandemic has affected the hearts of unborn babies, but we need to untangle the reasons for this link. We need to determine if the SARS-CoV-2 virus directly causes the development of fetal heart problems during pregnancy, and if so, how the virus makes these changes in the heart.

    We don't have this type of data set available in the UK, but it's important to see if this pattern is seen in other parts of the world.

    Covid-19 is still circulating and is easier to catch in the winter months. These results act as an important reminder for pregnant women to get their Covid-19 vaccinations to help protect themselves and their baby."

    Professor Asma Khalil, lead author and Professor of Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine at City St George's, University of London

Source:

City St George's, University of London
Journal reference:

Khalil, A., et al. (2024). Congenital heart defects during COVID‐19 pandemic. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. doi.org/10.1002/uog.29126.

[...]
News-Medical.Net provides this medical information service in accordance with these terms and conditions. Please note that medical information found on this website is designed to support, not to replace the relationship between patient and physician/doctor and the medical advice they may provide.

Last Updated: Monday 18 Nov 2024

AZoNetwork
News-Medical.net - An AZoNetwork Site
Owned and operated by AZoNetwork, © 2000-2024
[*/quote*]


Hier ist das Paper im Original zu sehen:

https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/uog.29126
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.29126



https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/3d302822-a53b-465e-b656-e0770a0e0a02/uog.29126.fp.png

Es ist als OPINION gekennzeichnet.



"No abstract available"? Warum nicht?


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39541959/

[*quote*]
An official website of the United States government
NIH NLM Logo

    Title & authors
    References
    LinkOut - more resources

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

. 2024 Nov 14.
doi: 10.1002/uog.29126. Online ahead of print.
Congenital heart defects during COVID-19 pandemic
A Khalil  1   2 , I Painter  3 , V Souter  3
Affiliations

    PMID: 39541959 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29126

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer
References
REFERENCES

        Metz TD, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, et al. Association of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection with serious maternal morbidity and mortality from obstetric complications. JAMA. 2022;327(8):748‐759.
        Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2020;370:m3320.
        Allotey J, Chatterjee S, Kew T, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 positivity in offspring and timing of mother‐to‐child transmission: living systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2022;376:e067696.
        Khan MSI, Nabeka H, Akbar SM, et al. Risk of congenital birth defects during COVID‐19 pandemic: draw attention to the physicians and policymakers. J Glob Health. 2020;10(2):020378.
        Granja MG, Oliveira AC, de Figueiredo CS, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnant women: neuroimmune‐endocrine changes at the maternal‐fetal interface. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2021;28(1):1‐21.

LinkOut - more resources

    Full Text Sources
[*/quote*]


[Smilie-Fehler beseitigt, Telly]