Allaxys Communications --- Transponder V --- Allaxys Forum 1
Die SUPER-NAZIS --- Hitlers Erben --- Sie sind mitten unter uns => Das IT-Netzwerk des heutigen Terrorismus => Topic started by: VanLaraklios on September 29, 2022, 10:37:05 PM
-
The gangs on Wikipedia and on rationalwiki have a hidden agenda.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emily_Willoughby
[*quote*]
Emily Willoughby
Jump to navigationJump to search
Emily Willoughby
The colorful pseudoscience
Race & Racialism
Icon race.svg
Hating thy neighbour
Racism
Racial pride
Nationalism
Divide and conquer
Far right
Mankind Quarterly
Arab supremacy
Michael A. Woodley of Menie
TempleOS
Dog-whistlers
Eric S. Raymond
Ovadia Yosef
Fred Phelps
Laura Ingraham
Paul Broun
v - t - e
Emily Willoughby (online pseudonyms: Ferahgo the Assassin[1], Linda A. Ashtear[2] and Ixerin) (1986–) is a right-wing paleoartistWikipedia, psychologist and proponent of race and intelligence pseudoscience. Willoughby lives somewhat a double life in the sense her Wikipedia edits as Ferahgo the Assassin reveal she supports eugenics and hereditarianism but on her social media using her real name she misleadingly denies supporting these controversial and offensive things and presents a more moderate image of herself.[3]
On August 11, 2022 a Twitter thread accusing Willoughby of racism and eugenics went viral in the paleoart community.[4] After people began to look into her digital footprint — she spent years making controversial edits on Wikipedia's race and intelligenceWikipedia article and has associated with far-right individuals including Emil Kirkegaard, whom she met in person and collaborated with on Wikipedia.[5][6][7] For disruption on the race and intelligence page, Willoughby was topic banned on Wikipedia in October 2010, banned from the wiki in May 2012, but unbanned with editing restrictions in March 2014.[8] Her ex-boyfriend, Jonathan Kane, is permanently banned from Wikipedia for edit-warring on the same race and intelligence article.[9] On October 22, 2020 Kane and Willoughby published an article titled "The left-wing bias of Wikipedia" in The Critic, both using pseudonyms.[10][11]
Willoughby identifies politically as a conservative[12] and has written for the rag Quillette.[13]
The revelation that Willoughby is a proponent of race and IQ pseudoscience and has links to white nationalists led to numerous academics to distance themselves from her, notably including palaeontologists Darren Naish,[14] Mark P. WittonWikipedia[15] and Lisa Buckley.[16] On the other hand, the biologist Jerry Coyne has defended her in a blog post.[17]
Willoughby is a vorarephiliac and has drawn obscene sexual voreWikipedia and bestiality artwork.[18][19]
Contents
1 Background
2 Controversies
2.1 Race and intelligence
2.2 Eugenics and dysgenics
2.3 Wikipedia AfD
2.4 Nazi dinosaur and vorarephilia art
3 See also
4 External links
5 References
Background
Born on November 17, 1986 in US.[20] Her academic qualifications include a bachelor's degree in biology from Thomas Edison University, a master's degree and PhD in psychology from the University of Minnesota.[21] She is currently a postdoctoral researcher in the behavior genetics lab at the University of Minnesota.[22][23] Willoughby has published on behavioural genetics and IQ in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature Genetics, Intelligence and Journal of Personality.[24] She is an International Society for Intelligence Research Board Member[25] and was involved in creating the program for ISIR's annual conference in 2021[26] (held online because of the coronavirus pandemic).
Willoughby is a furry and used to own an account under the pseudonym Ixerin on FurAffinity.[27] She has an article on WikiFur.[28]
In 2017, she co-authored with Jonathan Kane and T. Michael Keesey the anti-creationism book God's Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism. The book has been praised for its "painstakingly detailed rebuttals to papers by creationists."[29] In March 2018, Naish wrote a positive review on his Tetrapod Zoology blog.[30]
Willoughby is an accomplished paleoartist and in addition to her postdoctoral job works part time as a professional scientific illustrator. Her artwork can be found on her old and current DeviantArt pages.[31][32] She has done illustrations of dinosaurs for scientific papers including Nature.[33] In October 2021, she published Drawing and Painting Dinosaurs: Using Art and Science to Bring the Past to Life which has received favourable book reviews.[34] She has been interviewed by Mark P. Witton on his palaeontological blog.[35]
Controversies
Race and intelligence
Willoughby's Wikipedia account (created on June 26, 2008) is named Ferahgo the Assassin.[36]
On November 9, 2009 she began editing the race and intelligenceWikipedia article talk and wrote the following comment on a noticeboard:
“”After perusing this article, I've got to say that the current version looks fairly unbalanced. If there is a significant body of scientists out there that support a partially genetic basis for racial differences in IQ, then that proportion of scientists should be accurately represented in the article, and the article should not be written under the assumption that this conclusion is false.[37]
On May 1, 2010 Willoughby opposed banning her boyfriend Kane (alias Captain Occam) and the neo-Nazi editor Michael Coombs (alias Mikemikev) from the race and intelligence article, writing "they aren’t the ones causing a problem here" despite evidence to the contrary.[38] Kane and Mikemikev were both topic banned in June 2010 after arbitration found them to have edit-warred and caused disruption.[39] Not long after Kane was prevented from editing the race and intelligence page, Willoughby's Ferahgo the Assassin account was accused of being his sockpuppet.[40] This resulted in a sockpuppet investigation being filed against her on August 30, 2010.[41] To avoid being banned from the wiki entirely, Kane posted his and Willoughby's DeviantArt accounts to prove they are separate persons but admitted to knowing each other in real life.[42] On September 1, 2010 Willoughby at Wikimedia Commons linked to her DeviantArt profile on her user page and a few years later openly identified on the wiki as Emily Willoughby.[43]
Edits on her account reveal Willoughby is sympathetic to the controversial race and intelligence views of the white supremacist Richard Lynn:
“”The way it's worded makes it sounds like the articleWikipedia is expressing this point of view specifically (that Lynn's conclusions are incorrect, etc) instead of making it clear that these critiques are held by other professionals.[44]
Willoughby also complained about an article highlighting Lynn's connections to the eugenics Pioneer Fund[45] and took issue with critical sources being added to his biographical page:
“”The four sources in further reading and external links you've decided to add and keep — other than the official website — have created an NPOV problem. You got rid of all of the neutral or positive links and the four remaining ones are extremely critical of Lynn.[46]
In October 2010, Willoughby was topic banned from editing race and IQ related articles.[47] The following month she was back to her old tricks removing critical sources about a eugenicist.[48]
Willoughby and Kane were both "site-banned from Wikipedia for a period of no less than one year" on May 14, 2012.[49] The reason was for sharing an IP address.[50]
Shortly before being site banned in a rant titled "Good riddance to Wikipedia", Willoughby admitted to being a proponent of hereditarianism and defended Mikemikev again.[51]
Willoughby was unbanned on Wikipedia on March 28 2014.[52] For the next five years she avoided editing about race and IQ but in January 2019 she appealed her topic ban which was still in place.[53]
In January 2019, Willoughby deceptively attempted to have her topic ban rescinded by arguing she was now "agnostic" on the question of genes vs environment in the race and intelligence controversy:
As per the advice from SilkTork's email, I'll briefly state my views here, but will be unwilling to argue about details in public. I do not believe the available evidence is sufficient to support either the hereditarian perspective or the pure environmentalist perspective. One thing I've learned since 2012 is that the evidence that would be needed to support hereditarianism is a lot more complex than I thought back then, and is still largely out of reach. My understanding is that an "agnostic" perspective is most mainstream among people who actually study cognitive ability and genetics, as reflected in Earl Hunt's textbook on intelligence: "Neither I nor anyone else knows the cause of the differences in indices of intelligence among various racial and ethnic groups. Furthermore, there almost certainly is not any single cause, and the causes may vary for different comparisons." As I said before, I can explain my views in more detail in an email if desired, including other mainstream sources that support an agnostic perspective.[54]
Magnus Pharao (alias Maunus), an anthropologist who debated Willoughby and Kane on Wikipedia in the 2010s, noted on his Twitter account on August 12, 2022:
The two of them were pushing race and IQ "science" on Wikipedia for years, both being banned for doing so incessantly and deceptively […] That's also where I first met Emil Kirkegaard, he was working with them some of the time. Kirkegaard's username was Deleet. Kane and Willoughby worked a good cop bad cop routine, she more or less followed the rules and stayed civil, he didn't and was banned, and when he was banned he edited from her account, and when it was discovered they shared, she was banned too. Kane's MO was to contact as many "hereditarians" offline as he could and get them to weigh in in discussions to create a majority against the idea that Race and IQ research is considered fringe pseudoscience.[55][56][57]
There is evidence Willoughby and Kane collaborated with and defended Kirkegaard on Wikipedia.[58][59][60] Kane, Willoughby and Kirkegaard edited the same race and IQ related articles with overlapping edits as a sort of 'tag-team' with the same point of view. During the appeal of her race and intelligence topic ban, Willoughby refused to answer an admin, Doug Weller, about her association with Emil Kirkegaard:
I hope you can appreciate the concerns expressed about the R&I area. We already have User:Deleet active in the area, and as you probably know (if only because of the publicity he garnered under his real name Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, declared on his user page) he was an active figure in the London conferences. See for instance — the YouTube journalist Tara McCarthy mentioned there is a white separatist (some would say supremacist) who supports deportation of non-white citizens. It would be helpful if you could disclose whether you've worked with any of them — as I said, your comments here are not limited by your topic ban. Whatever you may think, I'd like to see you contribute to our scientific articles related to your PhD field as it's clear you have a lot to offer, but your unwillingness to discuss your views is a bit worrying. By the way, I am extremely impressed by your paleoart.[61]
Willoughby has met Kirkegaard in person at ISIR conferences, interacts with him on social media and is a mutual follower on Twitter of his OpenPsych account.[62][63] On January 31, 2019 Willoughby somehow managed to appeal her race and intelligence topic ban (8 votes for, 2 votes against) despite one admin described this decision as a "poor idea" and another voted against it, after mentioning her edit history of "grave misconduct."[64] On February 21, 2019 Emil Kirkegaard was permanently banned from editing Wikipedia.[65] Kane was permanently banned on January 9, 2020.[66] On October 22, 2020 Kane and Willoughby published an article, "The left-wing bias of Wikipedia" in The Critic complaining about a lack of "viewpoint diversity" including on the race and intelligence article. Deceptively neither used their real names; Willoughby used the pseudonym Linda A. Ashtear, and Kane, Shuichi Tezuka.[67] Despite claiming Wikipedia has a left-wing bias neither mentioned their own right-wing bias and problematic edits.
On May 19, 2022 Willoughby was once again editing Richard Lynn's articleWikipedia on Wikipedia to remove critical sources. Willoughby removed the following sentence: "Lynn's work on national IQ differences have been rejected by mainstream academic media."[68] Willoughby has further argued hereditarianism is not a fringe or pseudoscientific viewpoint.Do You Believe That?
On July 18, 2022 Jonathan Kane using the pseudonym Shuichi Tezuka published an article titled "Cognitive Distortions" in Quillette defending Ferahgo the Assassin's controversial edit history on Wikipedia.[69] Kane does not mention Willoughby by her real name but provides clues such as describing Ferahgo as "a postdoctoral researcher in behavior genetics." In a thread on Wikipediocracy forum, a user identifies Feragho as Willoughby and the article writer as Kane.[70] In the same thread Kane (posting as Captain Occam) does not deny he is Shuichi Tezuka. Kane's article claims a group of left-wing editors under the influence of critical race theory took control of Wikipedia around the death of George Floyd and began making changes on the race and intelligence article labelling hereditarianism as a fringe point of view:
It is tempting to assume that these changes are consequences of the George Floyd protests that began in May 2020, and the consequent rise in the influence of Critical Race Theory. In fact, the examples discussed above began in April 2020, about a month before Floyd’s death. Still, it is possible that this timing is not truly a coincidence, and that the social environment in spring and summer of 2020 inevitably produced these sorts of effects. The event that precipitated most of these changes was a discussion that occurred in March and April 2020, which concluded that Wikipedia should classify the hereditarian viewpoint as a “fringe theory,” giving it the same status as the view that the Earth is flat or that vaccines cause autism. Over the past two years, nearly every removal of content from intelligence-related Wikipedia articles has cited this discussion or its conclusion as justification.
Kane's conspiracy theory is unfounded and his article has been described as "mostly nonsense" by Eric Turkheimer.[71] Promoters of Kane's conspiracy theory include Kirkegaard,[72] and Charles Murray.[73]
On August 12, 2022 Willoughby suspiciously deleted her Ferahgo the Assassin user page to conceal her real name which she linked to on a paleoart image. She then recreated the user page wiping the edit history. A public deletion log, however, reveals the deletion and a screenshot on a webpage archive shows the old version with her linked real name.[74][75]
The day Willoughby deleted her Wikipedia user page it was revealed she wrote a book review "bashing Gould and Jonathan MarksWikipedia for the work they've done in dispelling racist pseudoscience."[76][77]
Eugenics and dysgenics
Willoughby thinks dysgenicsWikipedia is legitimate science and has criticised it being described as fringe science or pseudoscience, relying on various dubious publications including by Richard Haier.[78]
On February 27, 2022 Willoughby was defending the eugenics annual London Conference on Intelligence on Wikipedia and racist Michael Woodley who has attended its conferences.[79]
Wikipedia AfD
On August 19, 2022 an experienced editor on Wikipedia created an AfD (article for deletion) page for Emily Willoughby's article primarily because of lack of notability.[80] The editor also mentioned "conflict of interest, lack of independent reliable sourcing, self-promotion and other violations of Wikipedia policy." Willoughby edited her own biographical article as did her ex-boyfriend, Jonathan Kane. Furthermore, the article creator "Luigi Gaskellis" is suspected of being either a sockpuppet or meatpuppetWikipedia of Kane.[81] The AfD attracted thousands of views and dozens of comments after Jerry Coyne wrote a blog post two days after the AfD was created, encouraging his followers to vote keep.[82] Coyne apparently does not understand how an AfD works — he mistakenly thought the article would be kept if many of his followers flooded the discussion on the page and voted to keep the article. As was clarified on the AfD page "consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes."
Coyne and his followers have made an unsubstantiated claim a "woke" mob are targeting Willoughby by voting to delete her article. This claim has been rebutted on the AfD by an editor named OsFish:
Instead, you've turned up in an openly partisan manner armed with what is, frankly, a conspiracy theory about woke editors trying to cancel people from Wikipedia for which you have, and this really needs stressing to followers of a critic of pseudoscience, zero evidence. (Professor Coyne seems to have imagined it.) When people ask these new editors to make arguments according to long-established, open, clearly-stated policies about which people and topics do or don't get a Wikipedia page of their own, almost none of you respect that and instead suggest it's part of the same, unevidenced "woke" conspiracy. (Ironically, given Professor Coyne's stance on the issue, the only reference any "delete" editor has made to the issue of "correct" or "incorrect" views has been to policy about not giving undue weight to creationism as a fringe view.) Of course we're going to kick back against all that. We're here to build an encyclopedia, not take part in culture wars. If or when Emily Willoughby satisfies the criteria for inclusion, she can be the topic of an article. That's it, really.[83]
The baseless allegation of cancel culture was repeated by Kirkegaard who has farcically likened the AfD of Willoughby's article to "book burning common under authoritarian regimes."[84]
Willoughby's Wikipedia article was deleted on August 26, 2022. An admin clarified the deletion had nothing to do with "wokeness":
The result was delete. Whether or not we keep or delete an article has nothing to do with the political bent of the subject, and everything to do with notability, as demonstrated by coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. As such I am entirely setting aside the many !votes here that do not examine evidence for notability at all, and are instead screeds about wokeness and conspiracies within Wikipedia. For the benefit of these !voters, I will note that I was unaware of this discussion until 30 minutes ago, when I found it among the deletion discussions requiring closure; and also that my personal preference is quite strongly for documenting completely any controversial academic work, rather than removing it. However, to do so we need evidence of notability, and there is clear consensus here that such evidence does not exist.[85]
Nazi dinosaur and vorarephilia art
Willoughby on her FurAffinity account in the 2000s uploaded obscene sexual vorarephilia and bestiality artwork. These drawings and paintings are NSFL but can be found on webpage captures of her account.[citation NOT needed] In August 2022, she was criticised on social media for having made artwork of dinosaurs dressed in Nazi uniforms.[86] She identified in 2009 on her FurAffinity journal as a vorarephiliac:
“”To answer your first question in more detail, yeah, vore can be a sexual thing for me, but I'm kind of picky about the specifics of it. My partner and I both think of hard, realistic vore as a naturalistic expression of our dromaeosaur sides, and the whole… predatory nature of our dromey sides is definitely something we find appealing and sometimes arousing.[87]
See also
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, eugenicist who holds abhorrent views on child pornography
Michael Woodley
Noah Carl
Hbdchick, racialist blogger
OpenPsych pseudojournals
External links
Her website
Artwork
Google Scholar
Twitter
References
Ferahgo the Assassin (archived webpage).
https://muckrack.com/linda-a-ashtear
https://twitter.com/eawilloughby/status/1557890456176005120
https://twitter.com/Prehistorica_CM/status/1557819532722552835
https://twitter.com/thebirdmaniac/status/1558484687357546496
https://twitter.com/CathrynTownsend/status/1558428187633352707
https://twitter.com/MagnusPharao/status/1558198647749214214
Wikipedia, motion: Ferahgo the Assassin editing restrictions modified (September 2016).
Jonathan Kane (archived webpage).
"The left-wing bias of Wikipedia," The Critic (22 October, 2020).
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=313311#p313311
The Long Patrol Forums, April 16th, 2012 (archived webpage).
https://quillette.com/author/emily-willoughby/
https://twitter.com/TetZoo/status/1559829920460800002
https://twitter.com/MarkWitton/status/1558895312789557254
https://twitter.com/Lisavipes/status/1559971204148056064
"The ignorant and misguided demonization of a behavior geneticist," Why Evolution is True (August 17, 2022).
https://twitter.com/asderatiq/status/1557874570949824517
Ixerin's journal, FurAffinity (May 3rd, 2009).
Willoughby, Emily: LC Name Authority File (Library of Congress).
University of Minnesota: Emily Willoughby.
About (emilywilloughby.com).
LinkedIn.
Google Scholar.
https://isironline.org/our-board/
ISIR 2021 program.
Ixerin, FurAffinity (archived webpage).
https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Ixerin
https://magazine.scienceconnected.org/2017/02/book-review-gods-word-human-reason/
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/book-review-gods-word-or-human-reason-an-inside-perspective-on-creationism/
Ferahgo the Assassin, DeviantArt (archived webpage).
Emily Willoughby, DeviantArt (archived webpage)
Curriculum Vitae (emilywilloughby.com).
https://inquisitivebiologist.com/2022/02/17/book-review-drawing-and-painting-dinosaurs-using-art-and-science-to-bring-the-past-to-life/
http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2021/12/an-interview-with-emily-willoughby.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ferahgo_the_Assassin
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=324780150
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=359534617
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence#Captain_Occam_topic-banned
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=381588295
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Captain_Occam/Archive
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Captain_Occam&diff=381827220&oldid=381819316
Ferahgo the Assassin, Wikimedia Commons (archived webpage).
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Lynn&diff=prev&oldid=383392069
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:IQ_and_Global_Inequality&diff=prev&oldid=383394943
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Lynn&diff=prev&oldid=387747289
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ferahgo_the_Assassin&oldid=389214154#Topic_ban
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Fairfield_Osborn&diff=prev&oldid=398999686
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence#Ferahgo_the_Assassin_and_Captain_Occam_site-banned
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=836154487
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence/Review/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=492038873#Good_riddance_to_Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence#Modified_by_motion_.28March_2014.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=881086731#Amendment_request:_Race_and_intelligence
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&direction=next&oldid=881255300#Statement_by_Ferahgo_the_Assassin
https://twitter.com/MagnusPharao/status/1557965075582967808
https://twitter.com/MagnusPharao/status/1557983938727092225
https://twitter.com/MagnusPharao/status/1558195918171787264
Cognitive Distortions, Wikipediocracy (archived webpage).
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaptain_Occam&type=revision&diff=849740376&oldid=849087301
https://twitter.com/MagnusPharao/status/1558205333121769480
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&direction=next&oldid=881255300#Statement_by_Doug_Weller
Twitter (webpage capture).
https://i.ibb.co/6sBgBr8/Emily-Twitter-Open-Psych.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&direction=next&oldid=881255300#Race_and_intelligence:_motion
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Deleet
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3ACaptain_Occam&type=block
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-left-wing-bias-of-wikipedia/
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Lynn&diff=prev&oldid=1088750055
https://quillette.com/2022/07/18/cognitive-distortions/
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=315052#p313311
https://twitter.com/ent3c/status/1549492300698587140
https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1549359237205196802
https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/1549469218797629445
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3AFerahgo+the+Assassin
Archived webpage, see also image.
https://twitter.com/CathrynTownsend/status/1557961081779281921
https://archive.ph/5371u
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1068168964
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1074362603
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emily_Willoughby_(2nd_nomination)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Luigi_Gaskellis
https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2022/08/21/the-imminent-cancellation-of-emily-willoughby-a-fight-to-remove-her-from-wikipedia/
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emily_Willoughby_(2nd_nomination)&diff=1106053588&oldid=1106052102
https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1562556944090423296
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emily_Willoughby_(2nd_nomination)&diff=1106772830&oldid=1106603210
https://twitter.com/antirac66/status/1558254581347274754
Screenshot.
Categories: RacismArtistsFurriesGeneticsLiving peoplePseudoscience promotersPsychologistsRacistsRacialism pseudoscientists
Navigation menu
Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in
PageTalk
ReadEditFossil recordSearch
Search RationalWiki
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
New pages
All logs
Help
Support
Donate
Community
Saloon bar
To do list
What is going on?
Best of RationalWiki
About RationalWiki
Technical support
Mod noticeboard
RMF noticeboard
Social media
Twitter
Facebook
Discord
Reddit
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Page information
This page was last edited on 4 September 2022, at 03:27.
Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki:Copyrights.
For concerns on copyright infringement please see: RationalWiki:Copyright violations
Privacy policyAbout RationalWikiDisclaimersCC-BY-SA 3.0, or any later versionPowered by MediaWiki
[*/quote*]
-
Dieses Thema kocht gerade wieder hoch. Elon Musk hat es aufgegriffen,